预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...
1/5
2/5
3/5
4/5
5/5

在线预览结束,喜欢就下载吧,查找使用更方便

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

护理管理Huliguanli《中国医学创新》第20卷第30期(总第636期)2023年10月舒适护理在肿瘤化疗恶心呕吐患者化疗期间的应用效果卢小华①【摘要】目的:分析舒适护理在肿瘤化疗恶心呕吐患者化疗期间的应用效果。方法:以2020年1月—2021年12月龙岩市第二医院肿瘤内科收治的62例肿瘤化疗患者为本次研究对象,并以化疗期间的护理计划分为常规组(31例,常规护理)和舒适组(31例,舒适护理),对比分析两组护理模式的综合应用价值。结果:两组患者护理前各项评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),舒适组患者护理后罗德恶心呕吐指数评估量表(INVR)、Piper疲乏评估修订量表(PFS-R)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)评分均显著低于常规组(P<0.05),癌症自我效能感量表(SUPPH)、肿瘤疾病患者的生活质量量表(EORTCQLQ-C30)评分均显著高于常规组(P<0.05);舒适组与常规组患者的护理服务的满意度分别为100%、77.42%,舒适组显著高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对肿瘤化疗患者实施舒适护理,可有效减轻化疗恶心呕吐反应、癌因性疲乏、负面情绪,提升自我效能、睡眠质量与生活质量,并取得较高护理满意度评价。【关键词】肿瘤化疗化疗不良反应舒适护理TheApplicationEffectofComfortNursinginPatientswithNauseaandVomitingUndergoingTumorChemotherapduringChemotherapy/LUXiaohua.//MedicalInnovationofChina,2023,20(30):096-100[Abstract]Objective:Toanalyzetheeffectofcomfortnursinginpatientswithnauseaandvomitingundergoingtumorchemotherapduringchemotherapy.Method:Atotalof62tumorchemotherapypatientsadmittedtotheDepartmentofOncologyoftheSecondHospitalofLongyanCityfromJanuary2020toDecember2021wereselectedastheobjectsofthisstudy,andweredividedintotheroutinegroup(31cases,routinenursing)andthecomfortablegroup(31cases,comfortnursing)accordingtothenursingplanduringchemotherapy,andthecomprehensiveapplicationvalueofthenursingmodeofthetwogroupswascomparedandanalyzed.Result:Therewerenosignificantdifferencesinscoresbetweenthetwogroupsbeforenursing(P>0.05).Thescoresofindexofnauseaandvomitingandretching(INVR),Piper'sfatiguescale(PFS-R),Hamiltonanxietyscale(HAMA),Hamiltondepressionscale(HAMD)andPittsburghsleepqualityindex(PSQI)incomfortablegroupweresignificantlylowerthanthoseinroutinegroup(P<0.05).Thescoresofstrategiesusedbypeopletopromotehealth(SUPPH)andEuropeanorganizationforresearchandtreatmentofcancerqualityoflifequestionnaire(EORTCQLQ-C30)weresignificantlyhigherthanthoseofroutinegroup(P<0.05).Thesatisfactionofnursingservicesinthecomfortablegroupandtheroutinegroupwas100%and77.42%,respectively,andthatofthecomfortablegroupwassignificantlyhigherthanthatoftheroutinegroup,wi