预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...
1/4
2/4
3/4
4/4

在线预览结束,喜欢就下载吧,查找使用更方便

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

备忘录memo金杜法律备忘录模板精品资料距信纸抬头下边缘1.30cmApril29,2005空一行PRIVILEGEDANDCONFIDENTIALMemorandum空一行to:JeffWood,Esq.Debevoise&Plimpton(HongKong)空两行ChineseCourt’sJurisdictionOverAT&T空两行*此为提纲挈领之部门,可促使作者在Background之后的法律分析中紧扣题目,故有书写此部分必要空一行YouhaveaskedustoadvisewhetheraChinesecourtwouldhaveJurisdictionover终*了凡冒AT&Tinthefollowingtransaction:*AT&TplanstoinvestinaChinese-foreignjoint的号标venturecompany(the“JointVentureCompany”)throughPudongLLC,anoffshore点、句之号specialpurposevehicletobeestablishedandwhollyownedbyit.*Onceestablished,后均等表PudongLLCwillenterintoajointventureagreement(the“JointVentureAgreement”)空示两withtwoChinesepartiestoformtheJointVentureCompany.Attherequestofthe格一句Chineseparties,AT&Tintendstoprovideaguaranteeintheformofacomfortletter(the“Letter”)toensuretheperformancebyPudongLLCofitsobligationsundertheJointVentureAgreement.TheLetter(acopyofwhichhavingbeenprovidedtous)expresslyprovidesthatitisgovernedbyNewYorklawandsubjecttothejurisdictionofNewYorkorFederalcourtsintheUnitedStates.TheletterisproposedtobesignedbyAT&TandcountersignedbytheChinesepartiestotheJointVenture左右边Agreement.边距距为为3.00cmQuestion3.00cmThequestioniswhetherAT&TwillbesubjecttothejurisdictionofaChinesecourtbyexecutingtheLetterinthemannerasdescribedabove.ShortAnswer**客户时间有限,有时只需要简短的结论性回答IfadisputearisesfromtheinterpretationorperformanceoftheJointVentureAgreementand,intheabsenceofavalidandenforceablearbitrationagreementamongtheparties,aclaimismadeagainstPudongLLCbeforeaChinesecourt仅供学习与交流,如有侵权请联系网站删除谢谢2上边距为3.00cm精品资料havingjurisdictionovertheclaim,itislikelythatAT&TwillbenamedasanindispensablepartyandtheChinesecourtmaydecidethat,sincetheLetterispartandparceloftheJointVentureAgreement,thecourtshouldhavejurisdictionoverAT&T.Analysis**建议写此部分UnderChineselaw,contractsoragreementssuchastheJointVentureAgreementwhichwillbefiledwiththerelevantChinesegovernmentalauthoritiesfortheestablishmentofcompaniessuchastheJointVentureCompanymustbegovernedbyChineselaw.Asaparallel,China’sCivilProceduralLawprovidesthat,intheabsenceofavalida