讨论式教学法在普外科临床护理带教中的应用效果评价.pdf

HEALTHEDUCATION卫生教育CHINAHEALTHINDUSTRYDOI院10.16659/j.cnki.1672-5654.2020.32.140讨论式教学法在普外科临床护理带教中的应用效果评价曾桂红郴州市第一人民医院肛肠外科湖南郴州袁423000观察普外科临床护理带教应用讨论式教学法的临床效果选择年月年月该院[摘要]目的方法遥20176要2019660名普外科实习生展开研究以分别抽样法将其划分为常规组和研究组常规组采取一般带教研究组立nn袁渊=30冤渊=30冤遥袁足于此基础实施讨论式教学法总结比较两组带教成效结果研究组基础护理理论知识专项操作法律意识较常规组评分显著升高差异有统计袁学意义与常规组相比遥研究组满意度尧比常规组尧满意度尧提升P幅度更为优异差异袁有统计学意义渊约0.05冤曰普外科临床护理带教袁应用讨论式教学96.67%法效果理想可提升实习护76.67%P结论生综合与职业素养袁降低护理差错率渊约0.05冤遥值得临床借鉴袁普外科临床护理带教袁讨论式教学法袁综合能力遥满意度效果[关键词]曰曰曰曰曰[中图分类号]R47曰G642[文献标识码]A[文章编号]1672-5654渊2020冤11渊b冤-0140-03EvaluationoftheApplicationEffectofDiscussionTeachingMethodinClinicalNursingTeachinginGeneralSurgeryZENGGui-hongDepartmentofAnorectalSurgery,theFirstPeople'sHospitalofChenzhouCity,Chenzhou,HunanProvince,423000China[Abstract]ObjectiveToobservetheclinicaleffectofdiscussion-basedteachingmethodinclinicalnursingteachinginMethodsgeneralsurgery.SelectedfromJune2017toJune2019,60generalsurgeryinternsinthehospitalwereselectednnforresearch,andtheyweredividedintoroutinegroup(=30)andresearchgroup(=30)bysamplingmethodseparately.Theregulargroupadoptedgeneralteaching,andtheresearchgroupimplementedadiscussion-basedteachingmethodbasedonResultsthisfoundation,andsummarizedandcomparedtheeffectivenessofthetwogroups.Thescoresofbasicnursing,theoreticalknowledge,specialoperations,andlegalawarenessofthestudygroupweresignificantlyhigherthanthoseofthePconventionalgroup,thedifferencewasstatisticallysignificant(<0.05);comparedwiththeconventionalgroup,thesatisfactionofthestudygroupwas96.67%thanthatoftheconventionalgroup76.67%improvementwasmoreexcellent,thedifferencePConclusionwasstatisticallysignificant(<0.05).Theapplicationofdiscussion-basedteachingmethodingeneralsurgeryclinicalnursingteachinghasanidealeffect,whichcanimprovethecomprehensiveandprofessionalqualityofinternsandreducethenursingerrorrate.Itisworthyofclinicalreference.[Keywords]Generalsurgery;Clinicalnursingteaching;Discussionteachingmethod;Comprehensiveability;Satisfaction;Effect普外科实践性与逻辑性较强对刚迈向社会的实习欲望更是未能满足新时代护理发展的需求因此寻找生来说