预览加载中,请您耐心等待几秒...
1/4
2/4
3/4
4/4

在线预览结束,喜欢就下载吧,查找使用更方便

如果您无法下载资料,请参考说明:

1、部分资料下载需要金币,请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档,再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压,在使用对应软件打开

156-SouthChinaJournalofCardiovascularDiseases,June2005_.Vol1±D. · ·论著· 经皮缝合装置在经皮冠状动脉介入术中 的应用价值 侯玉清,周忠江,黄铮,郭志刚,贾满盈(南方医科大学南方医院心内科,广州510515) 摘要:目的评价经皮缝合装置(Percloser缝合器)止血的安全性、有效性及临床应用价值。方法选取 2002年4月~2005年3月所做的经皮冠状动脉介人治疗患者504例。按止血方法不同分为传统压迫止血 组254例和血管缝合组250例,分析两组在止血时间、制动时间、总卧床时间及各种并发症的差异。结果 缝合法与压迫法比较,止血时间:压迫组为(25+_6)分钟,血管缝合组为:(6.O±0.4)分钟(P<O.001);下肢制 动时间:压迫组为(26+_4)小时,血管缝合组为(4.0±1.2)小时(P<O.001);总卧床时间:压迫组为(25.2± 4.5)小时,血管缝合组(6.0±1.3)小时(P<0.001)。压迫组术后并发症如出血、血肿、迟发出血(第3日~1 周)、迷走反射、皮肤溃烂等,明显高于缝合组(P<0.001)。结论Percloser缝合器止血用于冠状动脉造影及 经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术或支架术后患者,止血时间与卧床制动时间明显缩短,并发症少,安全有效,操作 简便,止血效果可靠。 关键词:经皮缝合装置;压迫止血;冠状动脉造影;冠状动脉介人治疗:并发症 中图分类号:R654.3,R541.4文献标识码:A文章编号:1007—9688(2005)03—0156—04 1heclinicalapplicationofPercloseinpercutaneouscoronaryintervention HouYuqing,ZhouZhongjiang,HuangZheng,GuoZhigang,JiaManyin DepartmentofCardiology,NanFangHospital,theGuangdongprovincialSouthernMedical University,Guangzhou510515,China Abstract:0bjecfivesToassessthevalidityeficacyandclinicalapplicationofasuture.mediatedclosure device(Percloser)comparedwithstandardmanualcompressioninpatientsafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventions. Themajorobservationendpointsincludedtheincidenceofvaseularcomplicationsandthetimetoambulation aftertheprocedures.MethodsFivehundredandfourconsecutivepatientsunderwentpereutaneouscoronary interventionwererandomlytreatedwithstandardmanualcompression(n:254)andsuture—mediatedpercutaneous closureofantegradefemoralaccesssitebyPercloser(n=250)incardiaccatheterizationsprocedures.Suture. mediatedclosureorinanualcompressionwereproceduredindependentoftheanticoagulationlevelaftercardiac catheterizationprocedures.Thetimetoachievehemostasisandthetimetoambulationwascompared ,andthe incidenceofcomplicationswasevaluatedtoo.ResultsAsignifcantreductioninthetimetoachievehemostasis wasobserved(6±0.4vs25+_5.6minutes,P<O.001)inpercloserclosuregroupandstandardcompressiongroup respectively.Thetimetoambulationwasalsolessened(4±1.2vs26+_3.8hoursP<0.001)inthetwogroupsandthis seemedtobesignific