预览加载中，请您耐心等待几秒...

Altmertrics视角下期刊影响力二维评价方法研究——以国际图书情报学期刊为例.docx

预览
1/2
2/2

在线预览结束，喜欢就下载吧，查找使用更方便

下载提示 文本预览

如果您无法下载资料，请参考说明：

1、部分资料下载需要金币，请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档，再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压，在使用对应软件打开

Altmertrics视角下期刊影响力二维评价方法研究——以国际图书情报学期刊为例 Title:AResearchontheTwo-DimensionalEvaluationMethodofJournalInfluencefromAltmetricsPerspective:ACaseStudyoftheInternationalJournalofLibraryandInformationScience Abstract: Inrecentyears,thetraditionaljournalimpactfactorhasbeencriticizedforitslimitationsincapturingthetrueimpactandvalueofscholarlypublications.Altmetrics,whichreferstothealternativemetricsusedtomeasurethediverseimpactsofresearchoutputs,offersabroaderperspectivetoevaluatejournalinfluence.Thisresearchaimstoproposeatwo-dimensionalevaluationmethodforjournalinfluencefromanAltmetricsperspective,usingtheInternationalJournalofLibraryandInformationScience(IJLIS)asacasestudy. Introduction: Scholarsandresearchersrelyonjournalstodisseminatetheirresearchfindingsandincreasetheirvisibilityintheacademiccommunity.Journalinfluencetraditionallyhasbeenmeasuredbytheimpactfactor,whichisbasedoncitationcounts.However,thismetricfailstocapturethenon-traditionalimpactsandengagementthatapublicationmayhaveinthedigitalage.Altmetrics,ontheotherhand,provideamorecomprehensiveandinclusiveapproachtoevaluatejournalinfluence,consideringawiderangeofattentionindicatorssuchassocialmediamentions,downloads,andbookmarks. Methodology: Thisresearchadoptsamixed-methodsapproachtodevelopthetwo-dimensionalevaluationmethodofjournalinfluencefromanAltmetricsperspective.Firstly,aquantitativeanalysiswillbeconductedtocollectAltmetricsdatafromvarioussources,includingsocialmediaplatforms,academicplatforms,andonlinereferencemanagers.ThecollecteddatawillthenbeanalyzedusingdescriptiveandinferentialstatisticalmethodstocalculatetheAltmetricscoreforeacharticlepublishedinIJLIS. Secondly,aqualitativeanalysiswillbeperformedtoidentifytheinfluencesandengagementpatternsofIJLISarticles.Thiswillinvolveanalyzingthecontentofsocialmediamentions,analyzingcommentsandreviewsonacademicplatforms,andconductinginterviewswithresearchers,scholars,andpractitionersinthefieldoflibraryandinformationscience. Results: Basedonthequantitativeandqualita