预览加载中，请您耐心等待几秒...

批判性语篇分析视角下的大学英语教学模式研究.docx

预览
1/3
2/3
3/3

在线预览结束，喜欢就下载吧，查找使用更方便

下载提示 文本预览

如果您无法下载资料，请参考说明：

1、部分资料下载需要金币，请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档，再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压，在使用对应软件打开

批判性语篇分析视角下的大学英语教学模式研究 Abstract ThispaperexaminesthecurrentsituationofcollegeEnglishteachingfromtheperspectiveofcriticaldiscourseanalysisandproposesamoreeffectiveteachingmodelthatcanimprovestudents'criticalthinkingandlanguageskills.ThestudyarguesthatcollegeEnglishteachingshouldnotmerelyfocusongrammarrulesandvocabularylists,butalsoemphasizetheimportanceofcriticalreading,writing,andthinking.Theauthorsuggeststhatastudent-centeredandinterdisciplinaryapproachtoteachingcollegeEnglishisneededtofostercriticalthinkingandlanguageacquisition. Keywords:criticaldiscourseanalysis,collegeEnglishteaching,criticalthinking,languageskills,interdisciplinaryapproach. Introduction Englishhasbecomeagloballinguafranca,andmasteringthelanguagehasbecomeacriticalfactorforpersonalandprofessionalsuccess.InChina,collegeEnglishcoursesaimtoequipstudentswithbasiclanguageskills,whichincludelistening,speaking,reading,andwriting.However,manystudentsfinditdifficulttoachievesatisfactoryresultsintheirEnglishtests,despitehavingputsignificanteffortintotheirstudies. ResearchhasshownthattraditionalEnglishteachingoftenneglectscriticalthinking,whichisanessentialcomponentinthelearningprocess.Criticalthinkinginvolvestheabilitytoanalyzeandevaluateinformationaccuratelyandobjectively.Thus,fosteringcriticalthinkingskillsiscrucialtodeepeningstudents'understandingoftheclassroommaterialsandenhancingtheirlanguageacquisition. ThispaperexaminesthecurrentsituationofcollegeEnglishteaching,identifiesitslimitationsandproposesastudent-centeredandinterdisciplinaryapproachtoimprovestudents'criticalthinkingandlanguageskills. Background TraditionalEnglishteachinginChinaprimarilyfocusesontheacquisitionofgrammarrules,vocabularyandpronunciation.Insuchateachingmodel,studentsarerequiredtomemorizegrammarrulesandvocabulary,andfollowsetpatternstoproduceastructuredessay.Thisapproachdoesnotemphasizecriticalthinkingandoftenfailstodevelopstudents'languageskillsbeyondasuperficiallevel. Moreover,studentsareoftenpassivelearnersinthistraditionalped