两种清洗方法对管腔器械清洗效果观察.docx

两种清洗方法对管腔器械清洗效果观察【摘要】目的：探讨管腔器械的两种不同清洗方法效果，提高管腔类器械清洗质量，减少医院感染。方法：选取2019年10月1日至2020年3月31日本院手术使用后的重度污染的管腔器械600件作为研究对象，按随机法分成对照组和实验组，每组各300例。对照组采用手工清洗+超声清洗机清洗方法清洗管腔器械，实验组采用手工清洗+减压沸腾机清洗机清洗方法清洗管腔器械，按照各自清洗流程清洗后，分别采用目测法、95%医用酒精检测法、蛋白残留监测法对不同管腔器械进行清洗质量检查。结果：对照组和试验组结果均采用spss25.0计算方法得出目测法合格率分别为对照组93.00%，试验组96.67%。采用95%医用酒精检测法得出合格率分别对照组91.00%，试验组95.33%。采用蛋白残留检测法得出合格率分别对照组84.33%，试验组90.33%。两组数据进行比较，差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：采取手工清洗+减压沸腾清洗机清洗管腔类器械清洗方法，能有效提高管腔类器械的清洗质量，减少医院感染，是临床中值得推广的一种方法。【关键词】消毒供应中心；管腔类器械；减压沸腾；清洗ObservationoncleaningeffectoftwokindsofcleaningmethodsontubecavityinstrumentChenHuang,DisinfectionsupplyCenter,FirstAffiliatedHospitalofBengbuMedicalCollege,BengbuCity,AnhuiProvince,233000【Abstract】Objective：Toexploretheeffectsoftwodifferentcleaningmethodsforluminalinstruments,improvethecleaningqualityofluminalinstruments,andreducehospitalinfections.Methods:FromOctober1,2019toMarch31,2020,600piecesofheavilycontaminatedluminalinstrumentsaftersurgeryinJapanesehospitalswereselectedastheresearchobjects,andtheywererandomlypidedintocontrolgroupandexperimentalgroup,with300casesineachgroup.Thecontrolgroupusedmanualcleaning+ultrasoniccleaningmachinecleaningmethodtocleantheluminalinstruments,andtheexperimentalgroupusedmanualcleaning+decompressionboilingmachinecleaningmachinecleaningmethodtocleantheluminalinstruments.Aftercleaningaccordingtotheirrespectivecleaningprocedures,visualinspectionand95%medicalThealcoholpurewhitecleaningroddetectionmethodandtheproteinresiduemonitoringmethodperformcleaningqualityinspectionsondifferentluminalinstruments.Results:Theresultsofthecontrolgroupandthetestgroupwerecalculatedusingthespss25.0calculationmethod.Thepassrateofthevisualmethodwas93.00%inthecontrolgroupand96.67%inthetestgroup.Usingthe95%medicalalcoholpurewhitecleaningstripdetectionmethod,thepassratewas91.00%inthecontrolgroupand95.33%inthetestgroup.Usingproteinresiduedetectionmethod,thepassratewas84.33%inthecontrolgroupand90.33%inthetestgroup.Thedataofthetwogroupswerecompared,andthedifferencewasstati