7999072_田紫萍_新旧规则对比下竞技健美操难度动作的分析研究_定稿-新旧规则对比下竞技健美操难度动作的分析研究.docx

PAGE\*MERGEFORMATIV摘要本文采用文献资料法、数理统计法与对比分析法对2013版及2017版FIG规则有关难度方面进行研究，从难度动作的数量及根命组/名、分值分布、减分情况、难度动作连接调整四个方面进行比较分析，总结出2017-2020版规则，在难度方面的发展趋势。结果显示：2017-2020版规则，难度动作有所减少，分值高的难度动作明显再增多，减少的大多是低分值的难度；总体来看新版规则高分值难度动作的提高提升了竞技健美操的竞技性与观赏性。对新规则的分析显示出难度动作的变化趋势以及发展规律，为教练员提供新周期规则难度动作的技术指向，有利于运动员训练、比赛时达到更好效果。关键词：竞技；健美操；规则；难度动作；对比ABSTRACTThispaperusesthemethodsofliteraturereview,mathematicalstatisticsandcomparativeanalysistostudytherelevantdifficultyaspectsofthe2013and2017FIGrules,andmakescomparativeanalysisfromfouraspectsofthenumberofdifficultactionsandrootlifegroups/names,scoredistribution,pointsreductionandadjustmentofconnectionofdifficultactions,andsummarizesthedevelopmenttrendofthe2017-2020rulesinthedifficultyaspect.Theresultsshowthatinthe2017-2020versionoftherules,thedifficultymovesarereduced,thedifficultymoveswithhighscoresareobviouslyincreased,andthereductionismostlythedifficultywithlowscores;Generallyspeaking,theimprovementofhigh-scoredifficultmovementsinthenewversionoftheruleshasimprovedthecompetitivenessandappreciationofcompetitiveaerobics.Theanalysisofthenewrulesshowsthechangingtrendanddevelopmentruleofdifficultmovements,whichprovidescoacheswiththetechnicaldirectionofdifficultmovementsunderthenewperiodicrulesandisbeneficialtoathletestoachievebetterresultsintrainingandcompetition.Keywords:Competitive;Aerobics;Rules;Difficultymovement;Contrast目录1前言……………………………………………………………………………12研究对象与研究方法…………………………………………………………12.1研究对象…………………………………………………………………12.2研究方法…………………………………………………………………12.2.1文献资料法…………………………………………………………12.2.2对比分析法…………………………………………………………12.2.3数理统计法…………………………………………………………23结果和分析……………………………………………………………………23.1难度动作在规则中数量的调整、根名组/名的调整…………………23.1.1规则中难度数量的变化……………………………………………23.1.2难度动作根名组与根命名的变化…………………………………33.2规则中难度