预览加载中，请您耐心等待几秒...

用合作原则和礼貌理论分析《理智与情感》中的会话含义.ppt

预览
1/10
2/10
3/10
4/10
5/10
6/10
7/10
8/10
9/10
10/10

亲，该文档总共40页，到这已经超出免费预览范围，如果喜欢就直接下载吧～

下载提示 文本预览

如果您无法下载资料，请参考说明：

1、部分资料下载需要金币，请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档，再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压，在使用对应软件打开

硕士学位论文答辩AbstractFramework1Introduction2LiteratureReview3TheoreticalFramework3.1Grice’sCooperativePrinciple3.1.1FourMaximsoftheCooperativePrinciple3.1.2FloutingtheMaxims3.2Leech’sPolitenessPrinciple3.2.2MaximsofthePP3.3BrownandLevinson’sPolitenessTheory3.3.1TheConceptofFace3.3.2Face-threateningActs(FTAs)3.3.3Off-recordPoliteness3.3.3Off-recordPoliteness3.4ConversationalImplicatureDeduction3.4.1TheMainFactorsthatInfluencetheDerivationofConversationalImplicature3.4.2TheRelationshipbetweentheCPPPandOff-recordPoliteness3.5Summary4ConversationalImplicatureinSenseandSensibilityTheexamples(conversations)areselectedfromSenseandSensibilitythentheyareanalyzedbythepragmatictheories.Theresearchprocedurewillbeshownas:4.1ConversationalImplicatureGeneratedbyViolationoftheQualityMaxim4.1.1Irony4.1.2Metaphor4.1.3RhetoricalQuestions4.2ConversationalImplicatureGeneratedbyViolationoftheQuantityMaxim4.2.1Understatement4.2.2Overstatement4.3ConversationalImplicatureGeneratedbyViolationoftheRelationMaxim4.3.1GivingHints4.3.2GivingAssociatedClues4.4ConversationalImplicatureGeneratedbyViolationoftheMannerMaxim4.4.1BeingAmbiguousorVague4.4.2DisplacingHearer4.4.3BeingIncompleteandUsingEllipsis4.5Summary5Conclusion5.2LimitationsandSuggestionsforFurtherResearch