预览加载中，请您耐心等待几秒...

中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(2009)(英文本).docx

预览
1/10
2/10
3/10
4/10
5/10
6/10
7/10
8/10
9/10
10/10

亲，该文档总共24页，到这已经超出免费预览范围，如果喜欢就直接下载吧～

下载提示 文本预览

如果您无法下载资料，请参考说明：

1、部分资料下载需要金币，请确保您的账户上有足够的金币

2、已购买过的文档，再次下载不重复扣费

3、资料包下载后请先用软件解压，在使用对应软件打开

中国法院知识产权司法保护状况（2009）（英文本） (IntellectualPropertyProtectionbyChineseCourtsin2009) 1.ThispaperispublishedinbothChineseandEnglish.TheChineseversionshallbetheauthoritativeversionforthepurposeofinterpretation. 2.Asapublicationforthefirsttime,thisPaperincludesabriefintroductionofintellectualpropertyprotectioninChinainthelast30years. Content Introduction I.FairandEfficientAdjudicationofIntellectualPropertyCasesAccordingtoLawhasMadetheJudicialSystemaLeadingForceinIntellectualPropertyProtection II.JudicialProtectionforIntellectualPropertyhasServedtheNeedsofSocioeconomicDevelopmentandhasObservedandDeliveredtheNationalIntellectualPropertyStrategy III.EnhancedJudicialSupervisionandGuidancehasCreatedGreaterConsistencyinAdjudicationPracticesandDecision-Making IV.CapacityBuildingforIntellectualPropertyJudgeshasImprovedJudicialCompetenceandQuality Conclusion IntellectualPropertyProtection byChineseCourtsin2009 Introduction ThePeople’sCourtsaretheStatejudicialauthorityforintellectualproperty(IP)protection,whichindependentlyexerciseadjudicativepowersaccordingtotheConstitutionandthelaw. China’sreformandopening-up(gaigekaifang)hasspurredthedevelopmentofintellectualpropertysincethelate1970sandearly1980s.BeinganationalandPartypriority,andbuttressedbystrongsocialsupportanddiligentjudges,judicialprotectionofintellectualpropertyinChinesecourtshasgerminatedandgrown.ThecurrentcomprehensivejudicialintellectualpropertyprotectionregimeembodiestheidealsofsocialismwithChinesecharacteristics,embracesthecountry’sdevelopmentneeds,observesChina‘sdutiesunderinternationalconventions.ItisanessentialpartofChina’sjudicialarchitecture. Inthelast30years,thePeople’sCourtshave: ––––Expandedtheirfunctionsandpowersinintellectualpropertyprotection ThePeople’sCourtsprovidedjudicialprotectionforintellectualpropertythroughcivil,administrativeandcriminalprocedures. Civiladjudicationhadbegunincludingcasesrelatingtotechnologycontractstowardtheendofthe1970s.Trademark,patentandcopyrightcaseswereaddedduringt