国内工科物理教材对比研究.docx

国内工科物理教材对比研究国内工科物理教材对比研究摘要：教材内容的改革和建设是新世纪物理教学改革的主要内容。然而纵观近些年内推出的工科物理教材，它们中的多数无论在内容体系，还是在教材的特色和结构以及其基础性内容与工程技术应用和高新科技发展等方面，很少明显突破，且普遍存在以下几个问题：物理教材内容大体相同，内容深化梯度不同；工科物理教材从教学上看，学时相差甚远；工科物理教材在教学目标和计划也有差异；教材难易程度也有区别。本文通过国内几套工科物理教材的对比研究，从前言，内容，插图，知识点，例题习题，适用性，可读性，可教性等方面的差异，寻找现行教材存在的问题如：内容陈旧，近代物理概念和方法没有得到应有的反映，与我国中学物理教育衔接不好，不少内容只是简单重复等。其次就是结合目前我校现行情况和我国人才培养的需要，对“21世纪”教材改革从合理性、系统性、新颖性、实际性、继承性、适用性、可教性、例题和习题的多功能性编写和印刷的精致性等方面提点建议。关键词：工科物理；教材改革；对比研究；适用性；可教性ComparativestudyonteachingMaterialsofEngineeringphysicsatHomeAbstract:Thereformandconstructionofteachingmaterials’contentsistheprincipalcontentofreformonphysicalteachingreforminthenewcentury.However,mostofphysicalteachingmaterialsofengineeringaremakefewevidentbreakthroughrecentlyincontentsystems,characteristicsandstructuresaswellaselementarycontents,applicationofengineeringtechnologyanddevelopmentofadvancedscience.Andtheyexistingseveralproblemsinthefollowing:Thecontentsofphysicalteachingmaterialsaremoreorlessalike,andthegradientindeepeningofcontentsisdifferent.Fromteaching,thereisagreatdealofdifferenceinclasshoursofphysicalteachingmaterialsofengineering.Italsoexistingdifferencesintheplanandprojectofteachingforphysicalteachingmaterialsofengineering.Thedegreeofdifficultyisalsodifferent.Basedonthecontrastofseveralsetsofphysicalteachingmaterialsofengineering,accordingtodifferencesinpreface,contents,illustrations,knowledgepoints,examplesandexercises,applicability,readabilityandteachability,lookingforseveralproblemsincurrentteachingmaterials,forinstance,thecontentsarestaleness,andtheconceptsandmethodsofmodernphysicalareoutmoded,andtheconceptsandmethodsofmodernphysicalaren’treflectedduly;itisnotverygoodtojoinwithphysicalteachingmaterialsofmiddleschoolinourcountry,anditisonlyeasilyrepeatedinsomeofcontents.Andonthebasisofthecurrentconditioninourschoolandthedemandofcultivationofstudentsinourcountry,thispaperalsoproposessomesuggestionsforthereformofteachingmaterialsin21stcenturyinseveralaspects,suchas,reasonability,systematicness,novelty